Escolha uma Página

Not to our knowledge. A good team of customers should give unsuccessful bidders the return of tenders. Copies of the tender documents must be kept in the register. It is good practice to send relevant documents directly to the subcontractors mentioned in the parts lists and to inform contractors reporting that this has been done so that they know that they do not have to do so. Tender documents can be prepared for a number of contracts, for example. B for the supply of equipment, the main construction contract (including planning by the contractor), demolition, the possibility of works, etc. 2) In which tender package (TP) would “automatic sliding doors” be put? Is it electromechanical (EM), like elevators and escalators? Who specifies them? The architect or the EM engineer? NB: For construction management contracts, the tender file for commercial contracts may contain the master`s program of the site manager. In this regard, it is important to ensure that the interfaces between packets are correctly identified and clearly assigned to either packet. Too many packets increase the number of interfaces and therefore potential problems.

The cost plan (pre-tender estimate) should also be revised on a package-by-package basis to allow for a simple evaluation of the tenders received. There are a number of articles on the site that might be useful to you, in particular; The analysis of the contract amount, the tender price document and the schedule of tariffs. Others may also be interesting, such as for example; Parts lists, pre-tender estimation, measurement contract, purchasing route, etc. 1) What other formats of tender price documentation are used for different public contracts? From their point of view and experience, what are the advantages and disadvantages of each type? 4) What are the advantages and disadvantages of including detailed information in a tender document on the types of inspections that the engineer will carry out on the contractor`s treatment and marterials? Answering this question is not easy and would require a lot of research. In general, we would expect them to be in their own separate package, with the owners working in the electrical package. Indicated by the architect, probably using a closed specification based on a preferred manufacturer. 3) Is there some kind of publication that associates the “work results” with the generally expected TP? (although it is known that the allocation of WRs to PPs is, to some extent, project-specific.. .

. .